Personal Dilemma Paper

Personal Dilemma Paper

When you think of ethical dilemmas what comes to mind? As law enforcement officers you are held at a higher standard to uphold a higher ethical standard than most. Law enforcement officers are hired to protect us and the law, they are required to know right from wrong. A trial begins of EX DEA agents who owned a strip club. Strip clubs in the United States are not only widely popular but legal. Many adults indulge in this type of entertainment all over the united stated. Attending a strip club is not illegal as long as you are 18 years old or in some states 21 years old. The dilemma in this situation is that two DEA agents decided to partake in ownership of this club. Now most of us are aware of the notorious reputation strip clubs have. There have been many allegations of illegal activities such as, underage dancers, drug use and undocumented workers along with prostitution. I can go on and on about the allegations that are all over the media with this seedy business.

The ethical decision made

None the less two DEA agents decided to become part-owner of a strip club in South Hackensack, N.J. part of being a DEA agent requires you to list all your employment activities, you should list all full-time and part-time work, paid or unpaid. When these two men went to trial the two men sat in a courtroom in United States District Court in Manhattan as their trial began on charges that they had lied about and conspired to hide their involvement with the club, where prosecutors said they both worked regular shifts. Not only did they lie about their employment one of the officers had a relationship with one of the dancers that happened to be here illegally and was a Brazilian immigrant. The officer hid the relationship from Law officials denying everything. He had also lent her bail money from an assault charge against another officer.

Alternative courses of action and why

Though it is not illegal to have ownership of a strip club it is unethical to hide your employment from Law enforcement officials. These defendants betrayed the trust that was placed in them as federal law enforcement personnel by lying. When you decide to work in a career such as DEA you are informed that you must disclose all other types of employment. They were warned right on the form that lying was a crime. Not only did they hide the fact that they were employed they added additional lies to cover their tracks. This is unethical behavior. An alternative course of action would be to be honest and upfront. According to the DEA agent attorneys, the two men countered that they were merely investors in the club, the Twins Plus Go-Go Lounge, not employees. Cathy Fleming, a lawyer for Mr. Glover, said neither defendant had drawn a salary. Marc Mukasey, a lawyer for Mr. Polos, said his client saw the club solely as a place to “grow a little nest egg while he spent his days fighting the drug war.” In other circumstances if they were merly investors that may be in the guidelines for the DEA,