Critical Analysis Essay on Whether Environmental Concerns Are the Biggest Threat to Future World Economic Growth
Essay by Greek • August 16, 2012 • Case Study • 1,621 Words (7 Pages) • 2,592 Views
Essay Preview: Critical Analysis Essay on Whether Environmental Concerns Are the Biggest Threat to Future World Economic Growth
Critical Analysis Essay on whether environmental concerns are the biggest threat to future world economic growth
Synopsis
Economic growth is one of the hot topics being talked about nowadays. People care about economic growth a lot and everyday there are economists and professionals in other relevant fields discussing what are the threats to future world economic growth and are trying to work out of the problem. Environmental concerns are considered to be the biggest threat to future world economic growth by some people. It is very hard to agree with that opinion because there are other significant threats such as policies made by government, natural disaster, war, shortage or resource and widely-spread disease.
Introduction
Economic growth, as one of the topical issues, has been facing a lot of threats. There are people believe that environmental concerns are the biggest threat to future world economic growth. Are there other threats that have the same extent of influence on economic growth as much as environmental concerns do or even more effects? It is important to identify the serious threats. The overall purpose it to analys how and to extent does each of these threats affect economics to help us overcome the obstacle to develop economics.
There is no doubt that the concerns of environment are a huge threat to the growth of economic in the future. Environmental concerns such as pollution to environment draw a lot of people's attention. To protect environment and fulfill the vision of sustainable development, a lot of strategies have been taken which limits the growth of economic. But is the environmental concerns really the biggest threat to the world's future economic growth? In modern society, high-tech methods and new energy makes it possible to keep a stable and rapid growth of economic without burdening the environment badly. On contrary, economics can even go backwards because of wars and disasters and it is hard to overcome the harm caused by wars and disasters.
The policy framed by government is definitely an impressive threat from my point of view. If a government made a negative policy on economics or a wrong decision about how to develop economics, it will be quite difficult to end up without a terrible reflection on the principal economic indicators. Take my homeland China as an example, at the beginning period after the foundation of The People's Republic of China, the leads made some wrong policies including the Great Leap Forward and "cultural revolution", which made the economic fall into mire. People lived in a miserable situation with lack of food supply and serious inflation. While after the policy of reform and opening-up, China began to go on the proper way and achieved good economic growth. In 2011 the sales of car in China may be lower than the manufacturers' hope. I sum up three reasons. Firstly, the government begins to impose the tax of car sell. Secondly, the price of oil rises. Finally, the policy of allowance to car change in countryside is cancels. We can find that all these reasons are policies framed by government and because of the passive policy on car market, the economic growth on car market is no good. By the way, the price of oil is controlled by government in China which sometimes can be a destructive policy for car sales.
In my opinion, one of the biggest threats is natural disaster that may have significant affects on economic growth. A household example is the fearful earthquake and tsunami, from which Japan was suffered about a month ago, hit the economics hardly. The total output value deceased heavily in these areas around the epicenter. Even at places where are far away from the epicenter, the manufacture and the personal consumption were affected by the horrible earthquake. The tsunami destructed all the coastal houses, factories and base stations therefore a great deal of decline for export appeared (Takashi Tanikawa, 2010). The disaster made people reduce their shopping and the number of foreign tourists deduced which made a lot of people lose their job. The expert believe that Japanese economic will not recover soon. This event arouses the anxiety of the severely injury that might have been caused by the nuclear bomb. Many countries such as Germany, Italian and Australia signify that they will examine their nuclear power plants. The government of Germany signifies that seven nuclear power plants built before 1980 will be closed temporarily. But from my point of view, most of those countries of European Union will continue to use nuclear power for a long time since most of the powers are from nuclear power plants which is widely used now (Takashi Tanikawa, 2010). Compared with the damage of nuclear bomb, the reactions of these countries are seemed to be perfunctory. The environmental concerns can't hinder the step of these governments to pursue economic benefit.
Another great threat to economic growth, from my point of view, is war. War and violence can have a remarkable effect on economic growth and it makes a lot of people falling into
...
...