Cosmological Argument
Essay by caty03540 • April 7, 2015 • Essay • 841 Words (4 Pages) • 1,146 Views
The rational arguments for demonstrating God's existence, are elaborated proves about a Supreme Being. They are exclusively based on judgment in order to reveal that God is not an imagination product, but a reality. By them, they try to determine that God exists, but these arguments don't give information about Him. We receive more knowledge about God from the way in which God revealed to us during the years.
The cosmological argument, which is the oldest one, being known from the Hellenic philosophy, tries to demonstrate that God exists, and the world is necessarily finite. It proves that it couldn't exist an infinity of causes regressions that produces the existence of everything. This argument sustains that it has to be an un-caused cause who gave birth to all things. This is declared to be God.
According to the cosmological argument, there are things, but there is possible that these things don't exist. Everything that has the possibility to non-existence but still exists, it was caused to exist, because a thing cannot bring itself to existence; if it has to exist in order to create itself, this would be a non-sense. There is impossible to exist an infinity of causes in order to bring something to existence. Because the universe exists, it would have an un-caused cause of all things, and this cause should be God.
The cosmological argument refers to the fact that every single known thing in the Universe should have a cause, and that's why it would be logical to think that the Universe itself has a cause, and this is only God. Atheists say that God doesn't exist, and therefore the Universe appeared randomly. A single cell is formed from millions of molecules. The probability that something physic appeared out of nothing, without any external intervention is null.
Most of the philosophers demonstrated that God exists, proving that by the facts that every human being has a cause; nothing finite can't be its own creator; a causal chain can't have an infinite length, so forth a first cause, a starting point should exist.
The term of 'causality' refers to the 'material cause'. A material entity is caused by another material entity. If the Universe is the sum of every material entities, and the Universe in general should have a cause, this cause couldn't be material, but a non-material one. On the other hand, the non-material doesn't determine the material, according to the causality definition.
The causality argument starts from the observation that existence is a combination between causes and effects. The experience and the judgment reveal that the world is an organized combination of causes and effects, everything and every phenomenon having a cause and couldn't be also a cause of other effect. A thing is the effect of the cause that produces it, but it could also be the cause of an effect produced by it. But what it
...
...