Transparent: What Is There to Live For?
Essay by shana.shqair • May 10, 2016 • Essay • 1,541 Words (7 Pages) • 1,241 Views
Philosophy Final Exam/Paper Question/Topics
Choice from four questions- each with 2 parts
Textual 50%
Personal 50%
Eight to ten pages
First part 5-6 pg
Second Part 3-4 pg
You carry all these author’s beliefs in the authors we have read. Everything is connected historically and culturally, and there is something larger than ourselves.
Example: Slave mentality- we all have it because we see what is useful for us.
This isn’t a disease, it is who we are. Everything we touch, see, and learn forms who we are
First Part Like reading analysis: side by side with book BIG PICTURE
Second Part
Question Four:
Part I: Ideologies
Part II:
A)
B) Ethics and politics intertwined in stiegler
C) You I
Question Three:
Part I:
Be very Specific to answer all the questions and just those parts
Free spirt, noble spirit, multiplicity
Theory of Nietzche and Goldman of what the individual is
Nietzche: Individual is not free, unless the free themselves and understand the will to power
Goldman: Anyone that can argue/have an opinion and not fear authority
(rugged individualism and individualism
Question two:
Part I:
It is political
Nietzche: What is he doing in Genealogy? Why Reality: Multiplicity (create meanings and values
Marx: We need to change ideologies
What is Genalogy? A history of moral obligations
First part is all textual
Second part is a creation and reflection on what you know of life
Like Mill’s view of the genius: always needing to have growth
Stiegler =Traditional
Thesis: We can’t really live without having the nonexistent/impossible thing in our life.
The infinite
Pharmacon carries the infinite
Once you transfer care (feeling [trust, infidelity, etc.]) you need to have something worth caring for
Example: Mom cares for you it is transferred by the transitional object
Give the baby a teddy bear- care is transferred
Once you make something tangible (popcorn, heaven) takes meaning away from this life.
The way we create meaning is bad because we are taking away meaning
Today’s religion is science
Example: Just give me the data, everything can be quantified = positivism
To be able to conclude: What is going to happen?
Crisis: not just economic, but a crisis of meaning
Based on Affects:
Example: Trump and Bernie
Stiegler- We are sick and tired of things that are structured and lined up
Looking for meaning
Analyze what people are doing
We change meaning by trans-individual
Relations: Three Levels
- Affects
- Body
- Meaning
Read the final prompt to get some of Stiegler’s main arguments/ideas
Today is a global culture:
What are the processes?
- Curative projection processes
- Processes of anamnestic transindividuation
- Normative individuation processes
- Sublimation processes
- Processes of expropriation
- Processes of Disapprenticeship
- Processes of Grammatizion
- Processes of Disindividuation
- Processes for production and consumption of energy
- Collective individuation Processes
- Instrumental Processes
- Processes of Internalization
- Processes of chemical combination
- Processes of Adoption
- Processes of Interiorization
Ex: Nehilism
Social Reality:
Culture and Physic
You have a relation of care of with it
This is where we have morality
We are born in the culture, and whether we reject or accept it we still have it in us
It is all the affects, you belong to the culture even if you are resisting it
Culture is changing because of Capitalism
Capitalism is a pharmacon
Pharmakon
...
...