The Scoutmaster Case Study

The duty-oriented reasoning trying to justified with decision. But we must define duty-oriented reasoning which knows what is right from wrong. And how people act to the law. Therefore it is the paramedic duty to safe as much lives as they can , but in this case the scoutmaster would have to risk his life so the younger scouts could be saved" (Fremgen, 2012). The paramedic must aid the individual that are in need. And the biggest duty is to save the all the lives of the children and protect the innocent. (Riley, 2009).

Consequence Oriented reasoning

The consequence-oriented reasoning uses a cost/benefit analysis to benefit as many people as possible" (Fremgen, 2012). The situation was a bigger meaning than the action taken. The consequentiality signifies that the end justify the means. For example if someone lie just to save the other person life the act of saving the life would be morally sound and the act of lying would be justified through of the final results.

The lives of the scout would have more significance than the life of the single scoutmaster. And for the consequentiality, it would be better on moral grounds to help as many as you could, even if it cost a lot of money just for a one unit. As a result it would be morally necessary to sacrifice the scoutmaster and save the children. Because you would have saved more lives and few would had suffer.

Virtue-ethics reasoning

The virtue-based ethics is on persons and not necessarily on the decisions or principles that are involved. Many people agree that virtues are just good habits, such as fairness ad honesty. Virtue-based ethics or seeking good life is our legacy from the philosopher Aristotle" (Fremgen, 2012).

The value-based reasoning usage is the same as the other methods of reasoning, but for other reasons. The scoutmaster is held responsible for lives and good care of other scouts in his care. A responsible and virtuous scoutmaster will allow the scouts to get out-first so they may be safe and out of harm's way before he leaves. If the decision was courageous the scout would've been safely outside and if he would've got stuck in the front it wouldn't been fatal. Any way justice would dictate that, as the responsible party, he would be sacrificed to save those for which his selfishness and lack of virtue harmed" (Riley, 2009).

Each of the methods had the same idea; the dilemma with ethics is it is subjectivity. In this case situation was hard to determine; the morality was taken from the ones that were part of accident and they was reviewed. This is important when considering healthcare ethics which involves dramatics circumstances and choices. We must understand all parties view points, to understand the ethical issues, and settling and fixing the dilemma" (Riley, 2009).

"When determining who is right, it is important