Shooting an Elephant
Essay by cywasabi • November 27, 2012 • Essay • 312 Words (2 Pages) • 1,847 Views
How bad was imperialism in Moulmein in 1920s? What was the relationship between
Orwell and the Burmese? In "Shooting an Elephant," George Orwell presents a story, which
he reluctantly but practically killed an elephant. Orwell was a British police officer who always
teased by the Burmese. The Burmese see him as a representative of the British, and the
Burmese fail to realize Orwell simultaneously opposes English occupation of Burma too. One
day, Orwell was called to investigate an accident in the marketplace, where a rampant elephant
ran uncontrollably to destroy a marketplace. Orwell borrowed a rifle, which could shoot down
an elephant, from his friend. He hoped not to kill the beast because he thought killing a working
elephant was a hideous shame. However, Orwell was forced by the crowd to kill an elephant
at the end. The author listened to them because he did not want to be laughed at. In Orwell's
story, the aggressive elephant was symbolized as the powerful British Empire. An elephant was
important in the essay because the beast showed the evil side of imperialism.
When an elephant demolished the marketplace, Orwell symbolized the British Empire
pillaging the economy of Burma. Orwell clearly presents his dislike with colonial Britain by
saying "imperialism was an evil thing" (313). Imperialism puts down the occupied people by
lowering their social status in their own country. Also, imperialism stimulates the occupier to
make immoral decision to maintain their superior status. For example, Orwell acts against his
own principles to prevent looking a fool by killing an elephant. When British colonize Burma,
occupier restricts the freedom of natives. Orwell realizes he should allow the elephant to live.
Even though he holds a weapon, it is not Orwell's wish to shoot an elephant. However, due
to the crowds' expectation, he realizes that he must kill the elephant. Likewise, he was forced
to impose the strict law, but he demonstrates his feeling against it because he knows he is
forfeiting his freedom while oppressing the Burmese.
...
...