School Psychologists

School psychologists more often than not come across with complicated circumstances which entail these professional to view independently at every problem presented before then and as per accessible facts try to resolve the issue which might significantly affect everyone including (teacher, students, parents, and others). More often than not most of these problems are sensitively stimulating and notorious, with no clear solution.

In order for making probable school psychologist ready for managing these issues schools psychological department provide comprehensive training through various psychological graduate program with the help of set standards(Ehrich et al, 2011). After successful completion of these programs, internships, trainings, these apprentices join schools comprises of latest technologies, skills, and specialized work related distinctiveness which allow new apprentice to learn and grow. Moreover, it has become imperative for all graduate programs to endow fresh apprentice with proper legal and ethical guidance in school psychology.

It is extremely important for school psychologist to have proper training because they will come across with difficulties that would some time prove to intimidating(Fisher, 2009). Along with probable contradictory circumstances faced by school psychologist are mostly because of mounting desires of undergraduate and burden for doing something in life from parents, inquiry from instructors, exaggerated stress from supervisor, likely decreasing monetary wealth, challenges of executing facts related principles, and workings on the details of special education. The next section would provide further illustration of ethical dilemma as a school psychologist, example of incident faced by school psychologist, ethical standards used on that incidents, and probable solution of that incident.

Discussion

School psychologist while coming across with daily demands, school psychologists could benefit from implementing a problem solving framework to assess them in evaluating difficult situations and choose the most suitable route path. Experts of this field have documented the importance of using rational problem solving method mainly because it relates to right and lawful judgment. On the other hand, researcher like (Fouad et al, 2009) argue about the significance of apparent ethical strategy and utilization of specialized ethical decision making framework.

Meanwhile, () disagree with giving too much importance on individual conclusion by claiming it as an inadequate process since there is no guarantee that every assessment turns out to be similarly valid. Normally people tend to make decision mainly on spontaneous height and might arrive at solutions which stand on their instant affecting reaction to circumstances or individual perception. However, (Kennedy & Johnson, 2009) is of the view that focusing on instinctive decision is not adequate and it is important for psychologist to adopt critical judgment expertise to resolve issues.

Rogers & Sirin (2009) identifies its use as "analysis of decision'' it is necessary for different situations. One should identify the procedure of solving a logical procedure by considering the alternatives in that particular situation. In order to make an effective decision it is also necessary to evaluate the situation also in which the decision has to be taken. Blending both the intuitive and critical-evaluative types of thinking,

Further, () is of the view to blend both the approaches i.e. Institutive and critical ''it also helps in developing a logical kind of alternatives for the process of intuitive decision making'' (Thornberg, 2008) is of the view that, the concern of problem solving and ethical thoughts needs to be identified on real time basis.