Erp Software- ongoing Maintenance Cost Benefit Analysis
Essay by Atul Kumar • January 10, 2016 • Research Paper • 1,502 Words (7 Pages) • 1,511 Views
[pic 1]
ERP ASSIGNMENT 2
Titled:
“ERP software- Ongoing maintenance Cost benefit Analysis”
Submitted To: Submitted by:
Prof. Shirish Jeble Anurag Lall
Atul Kumar 36134
Devashish Belsare
Digvijay Singh Chauhan 36153
Kushagra Tayal 36187
Nikhil Gokarn
Tapas Das 36320
Table of Contents
Case overview
Problem Statement
Identification of key issues (chosen framework- PESTEL)
Political
Economical
Social
Technological
Environmental
Legal
Key Issues
Alternatives
Evaluation of alternatives
Alternative 1
Positive
Negatives
Alternative 2
Positive
Negatives
Alternative 3
Positive
Negatives
Financial analysis
Parameter for selecting chosen alternative
Choosing most optimal alternative
Evaluation for vendors for Alternative 2
Qualitative comparison
Quantitative comparison
Steps for Implementation phase for Alternative 2
Risk analysis and mitigation
Contingency/ B-Plan
Case overview
Problem Statement
Henderson the CIO city of big valley California needs to take a decision considering the following alternatives
- Commit to oracle fusion and negotiate a long term maintenance contract with the vendor
- Research alternate support models with lower cost, yet maintain current support levels
- Evaluate other ERP vendors to replace PeopleSoft.
Identification of key issues (chosen framework- PEST)
Political
- There is pressure on local govt. to increase taxes
- Rising unemployment
- Needs to invest heavily on infrastructure and IT
Economical
- Decrease in money supply because of decreasing tax base
- Rising labour costs
- Decreasing revenues yet increasing govt. expenditure
Social
- Non availability of skilled manpower and high unemployment
- Increasing number of immigrants mostly illegal
- Lack of quality and affordable healthcare
Technological
- Increasing infrastructure needs especially in IT sector
- Clerical jobs need to be outsourced to third party for better efficiency
Key Issues
- Lowering the existing high costs and govt. spending needs to be cut down
- Existing vendors were not responsive and hence they were facing issues resulting in escalating costs
- System designed must be flexible to future changes and altercations in local laws
Alternatives
- Commit to oracle fusion and negotiate a long term maintenance contract with the vendor
- Research alternate support models with lower cost, yet maintain current support levels
- Evaluate other ERP vendors to replace PeopleSoft.
Evaluation of alternatives
Now we are going to critically evaluate all the alternates to choose the optimal
Alternative 1
“Commit to oracle fusion and negotiate a long term maintenance contract with the vendor”
Positive
- Wide array of tools and applications to choose from
- Commitment towards data transmission as part of upgrade
- Easy to customize according to business needs
- Respected brand in ERP domain
- Users are familiar to existing system and hence less cost of training
Negatives
- Considerable higher cost in long run
- Customized reporting programs may not be transformed
- Complexity in usage
- Poor quality of support services (As given in the case that they are unresponsive at times)
Alternative 2
“Research alternate support models with lower cost, yet maintain current support levels”
Positive
- Better quality of support and maintenance
- Resolution of issues is prompt and takes less time
- Comparatively lower long term costs
- The vendors implementing the ERP package can be selected by the city administration
- The contract terms with the vendors can be negotiated
- Less system downtime
Negatives
- High set-up cost compared to other alternatives
- The personnel using the system needs to be trained resulting in additional cost
- Compatibility issues with other existing systems
Alternative 3
“Evaluate other ERP vendors to replace PeopleSoft.”
Positive
- May provide lower total cost of ownership than oracle or maintenance outsourcing
- Provides opportunity to find a closer match of software to business operations
- Tier II provider may suit local needs of business
- Tier II provider may cost significantly less than Oracle
Negatives
- Requirement of large new implementation project and updates to IT infrastructure
- Requires major retraining effort
- Implementation may consume a lot of time
- Comparatively higher set-up cost
- There is a risk of project not getting implemented properly
Financial analysis
Alternative 1 | Alternative 2 | Alternative 3 | ||||
Total cost in 3 years | Oracle fusion | Accenture | TomorrowNow | LegacyMode | Sunguard Bitech | GEMS |
780000 | 450000 | 390000 | 303000 | 725400 | 983000 |
Parameter for selecting chosen alternative
- Lower cost of chosen alternative
- Minimum technical skill up-gradation is required
- Robust to future up-gradation
- Caters to all business requirements
- Optimal technical framework out of available options
Choosing most optimal alternative
Alternative 1 | Alternative 2 | Alternative 3 | |
Lower cost of chosen alternative | Low (1) | Med (2) | High (3) |
Minimum technical skill up-gradation is required | Low (1) | High (3) | Med (2) |
Robust to future up-gradation | Low (1) | Med (2) | High (3) |
Caters to all business requirements | High (3) | Med (2) | Low (1) |
Optimal technical framework out of available options | High (3) | Med (2) | Low (1) |
TOTAL SCORE | 9 | 11 | 10 |
...
...