Mike Royoko's Article

Mike Royoko's article,

"if we're gonna have guns, let's get'em out in the open. Or else! Argues that having a gun law is a good thing. Mike backs up his claim about keeping a law on guns with showing descriptions and examples that prove the ineffectiveness and potential chaos without this law. Mike's purpose is to point out the diaster that is to come without having a gun law in order to catch the awareness and show that having a gun law is a good thing. He seems to have a very observant audience in mind because his tone is sarcastic and he suggest this by giving very good examples by telling everyone what could happen if this is blown out of portionif we're gonna have guns, let's get'em out in the open. Or else! Argues that having a gun law is a good thing. Mike backs up his claim about keeping a law on guns with showing descriptions and examples that prove the ineffectiveness and potential chaos without this law. Mike's purpose is to point out the diaster that is to come without having a gun law in order to catch the awareness and show that having a gun law is a good thing. He seems to have a very observant audience in mind because his tone is sarcastic and he suggest this by giving very good examples by telling everyone what could happen if this is blown out of portion if we're gonna have guns, let's get'em out in the open. Or else! Argues that having a gun law is a good thing. Mike backs up his claim about keeping a law on guns with showing descriptions and examples that prove the ineffectiveness and potential chaos without this law. Mike's purpose is to point out the diaster that is to come without having a gun law in order to catch the awareness and show that having a gun law is a good thing. He seems to have a very observant audience in mind because his tone is sarcastic and he suggest this by giving very good examples by telling everyone what could happen if this is blown out of portion